202
g.
Chance To Co26.
The Feet of Mate provided some alteration of this Intercolonial pension scheme of 1889 (which Scheme they contemplated, Conference banes) in contrast did make and that this Mante in say require verizon who some future line. The Council des pe lets plan Fres Stato states that the proposed Intercolonial pension line of 1889 has not been finally adopted. Of the season existing thank thereque de their place aught he antsituled tud modelled, willi mot verbal alterations no shall be found miscrsary, on Cannes lod 19 07 Lesrand Brands Parkins that! he milled.
"the or That
3
23. If in any of the employing Colonies, no retiring pension is payable, or a rate of pension less than the Imperial rate, the officer must be a loser to that extent. He must not claim from any Colony, from whose service he has been promoted, a rate higher than that authorised by the Imperial Pensions Act.
24. In some Colonies, a certain number of years are added to an officer's service, by way of bonus, in calculating his retiring pension. An officer promoted from such a Colony shall lose that bonus. An officer retiring from the service of such a Colony shall only be allowed it in case he shall have remained in that service for the time necessary to qualify him for receiving it.
25. If an officer does not remain ten years in the colonial service from which he retires, his salary shall, for the purpose of calculating his retiring pension, be taken on the average of the last ten years. The same rule will be applied in calculating the payment to be made to him in respect of any intermediate employment.
26. It may happen that an officer receiving a higher salary, without a right to pension, may be transferred to a Colony in which he will receive a lower salary with a right to pension. In this case the first salary shall be taken not only for the purpose of calculating the pension, but also for the purpose of calculating the deduction, as being of the same amount as the second.
A memorandum containing some supposed cases in illustration of Rules 20 to 26 is annexed, as also a table showing the rates of pension payable to the public officers of the Colony.
SUPPOSED CASES IN ILLUSTRATION OF THE FOREGOING RULES,
Number of Salary on Years' Service. Retirement Retiring Pension or prior to Deduction. Amount of Deduction. Retiring Pension from such Colony Total Retiring Pension. Promotion. after Deduction. £ s. d. £ s. d. £ s. d. Case of A. B. First employment. 10 200 2/10 × 200 33 6 8 30 × 1,000 = 500 0 0 NIL. 33 6 8 466 13 4 33 6 8 13 1 Total Service... 30 500 0 0 Case of C. D. First employment 26 800 2/6 × 800 = 346 13 4 3/4 × 880 = 440 0 0 NIL. 346 13 4 + 93 6 8 440 0 0 Total Service... 30 Case of E. F. First employment .... 10 200 1/9 × 200 33 6 8 NIL. 33 6 8 Second employment 10 400 1/3 × 400 = 133 6 8 100 0 0 Third employment. 10 800 1/2 × 800 = 400 0 0 133 6 8 206 13 4 Total Service... 30 Case of G. H. First employment 10 200 1/6 × 200 33 6 8 NIL. 33 6 8 Second employment, 10 1,000 2/8 × 800 = 266 13 4 without Retiring Allowance.... Third employment 10 800 1/8 × 800 = 400 0 0 266 13 4 133 6 8 166 13 4 Total Service... 30The case of A. B. shews the simple application of the 20th and 21st Rules, in Colonies which simply follow the Imperial Rules.
That of C. D. shews the application of Rule 25 in reducing the rate of salary to the average of 10 years (here to £880.)
If in these two cases the first employing Colony does not grant any retiring pension, then, under the 23rd Rule, the pension of A. B. (for twenty years' service) will be reduced to £466 13s. 4d, and that of C. D., (for four years' service) to £203 6s. 8d.
Again, if in these cases the last employing Colony be Ceylon or Hongkong, in which officers of ten years' standing are allowed an addition of 5 years to their actual service in calculating their pensions, then, under the 24th Rule, A. B. (having served more than ten years) would receive an addition to his pension of (5/60 × £1,000—) £83 6s. 8d.; but C. D., having served only 4 years, would receive no such bonus.
The case of E. F. illustrates the 22nd Rule.
The case of G. H. shows the effect of the 23rd and 26th Rules on an officer who has served in a Colony where no retiring pension is allowed.
Dec.
202
g.
Chance To Co26.
The Feet of Mate provided
some alteration of this
that
Interconal person scheme of 1889 (which
Scheme th
and contemplated, Conmaferen they
banes)
in contardid mi and that this Mante
in say require verizon
who some future line. The Couter des pe lets plan
Fres
бу Stato states hat the proposed Internet "person ich line of 7809 has not been finally adspelet. of the season exiinto thank thereque de their place aught he antsituled tud modelled, willi mot verbal alterations no shall be found miscrsary, on Cannes lod 19 07
Lesrand Brands Parkins that!
ت ما مر
he milled."
"the or
That
3
23. If in any of the employing Colonies, no retiring pension is payable, or a rate of pension less Nor must he claim from any than the Imporial rate, the officer must be a loser to that extent. Colby, from whose service he has been promoted, a rate higher than that authorised by the Imperial
pannuation Act.
24. In some Colonies, a certain number of years are added to an officer's service, by way of bonus, calculating his retiring pension. An officer promoted from such a Colony shall lose that bonus. officer retiring from the service of such a Colony shall only be allowed it in case he shall have remained in that service for the time necessary to qualify him for receiving it.
25. If an officer does not remain ten years in the colonial service from which he retires, his Kalary shall, for the purpose of calculating his retiring pension, be taken on the average of the last The same rule will be applied in calculating the payment to be inade to him in respect of ten years. ay intermediate employment.
4 26. It may happen that an officer receiving a higher salary, without a right to pension, may be ransferred to a Colony in which he will receive a lower salary with a right to pension. In this case the first salary shall be taken not only for the purpose of calculating the pension, but also for the purpose of calculating the deduction, as being of the same amount as the second.
A niemorandum containing some supposed cases in illustration of Rules 20 to 26 is annexed, as also a table showing the rates of pension payable to the public officers of the Colony.
SUPPOSED CASES IN ILLUSTRATION OF THE FOREGOING RULES,
Number of Salary
on
Years' Service.
Retirement
Retiring Pension
or
prior to Deduction.
Amount of Deduction.
Retiring Pension from cuch Colony
Total Retiring Pension.
Promotion.
after Deduction."
€
+
£
8.
it.
£
8.
d.
S.
d.
£ 3. d.
Case of A. B.
First employment.
10
200
Second employment.
20
1,000
@x 200 33 6 8 30x1,000-500 0 0
Nil.
33 6 8
466
88
33 6 8
13 1.
Total Service...
30
500 0 0
Case of C. D.
First employment
26
809
Second employment,
4
1,000
2x 800-846 13 4 0 0 34 x 880-440
Nil.
346 13 4
346 13 +
93
6 8
440 0 0
Total Service...
30
Case of F. F.
First employment ....
10
200
19 x 900 33
6 8
Nil.
33
6 8
Second employment
10
400
x 400-133
6 8
33 6 8
100
0 0
Third employment.
10
800
x 800-400
0 0
133 6 8
206 18 4
400 0 0
Total Service...
30
¡Case of G. II.
First employment
10
200
## x 200 33 6 8
Nil.
33 0 8
Second employment,
►
without Retiring
10
1,000
28 x 800-266 13 4
Allowance....
Third employment
10
800
88 x 800-400 0 0
266 13 4
133
6 8
166 13 4
Total Service...
30
The case of A, B. shews the simple application of the 20th and 21st Rules, in Colonies which simply follow the Imperial Rules.
That of C. D. shews the application of Rule 25 in reducing the rate of salary to the average of 10 years (here to £880.)
If in these two enses the first employing Colony does not grant any retiring pension, then, under the 33rd Rule, the pension of A. B. (for twenty years' service) will be reduced to £466 13s. 4d, and that of C. D., (for four years' service) to 203 6s. 8d.
Again, if in these cases the last employing Colony be Ceylon or Hongkong, in which officers of ten years' standing are allowed an addition of 5 years to their actual service in calculating their pensions, then, under the 24th Rule, A. B. (having served more than ten years) would receive an addition to his pension of (4; × £1,000—) £83 6s. 8d.; but C. D., having served only 4 years, would receive no such bonus.
The case of E. F. illustrates the 22nd Rule.
The case of G, H. shows the effect of the 23rd and 26th Rules on an officer who has served in a Colony where no retiring pension is allowed.
Dec.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.